Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

Why Print Lingers

Friday, March 12th, 2010

What was it that they said when the “information super-highway” was first launched? Oh yeah. Print is dead. And it almost died. But then something fabulous happened.

A great sea change occurred. People who use computers found that they longed for the smell of newsprint, the portability of a slick magazine to tuck under their arm. They’re clinging to their print magazines!

Do you doubt?

For the first time since the Great Recession began, both total magazine pages and rate-card-reported revenue have posted gains, according to Publishers Information Bureau (PIB).

Magazine audiences are growing — and young adults are becoming heavy readers. The number of young readers (18+) has grown more than 4% over the past five years.  Meanwhile, older audiences (50+) grew by almost 11% in the same period.

As of this year, 93% of adults overall and 96% of adults under age 35 now read magazines.

I grok these stats.

I read untold thousands of words per day. My eyes simply cannot keep it up. I need a break from the glare and the lumens. There’s the computer at work, the computer at home, the flat panel TV, the cell phone, cameras, iPods, e-Readers, camcorders. Ouch.

More than one doctor has commented to me that I should take a break from my electronic world. To ward off carpel tunnel, I use a left-handed trackball, a strange curved keyboard, a special chair, special angles for monitors and keyboards. And yet I suffer from tension headaches, blurry vision, stiff necks and back pain.

I am less patient with trolls and thumpers these days – people who pose as authoritative and knowledgeable sources. I especially despise political bloggers – cannot fathom why anybody should spend that much time ‘commenting’ about the opinions of other commenters. I know. I tried at MIXX – lead a brave fight to stay factual. But to what end? I verify everything before I repeat a single word of what I read online – especially blogs – and I never repeat a single word of what I read in comments. The product from so-called “socialization of publishing” – in my humble opinion – as thus far been less than impressive. Moreover, I think it is one of the destructive forces that are now at work in our society.

I miss professional reporters who know how to unwrap a feature story; who organize and at least try to find corroborating facts. I miss the blend of critical thinking with excellent authorship and professional presentation; a noninteractive print environment that’s easy to read with no animation, no pop-ups, no videos, podcasts or cookies. I miss discovering wonderful tidbits by accident while thumbing through my favorite magazine. Instead, I spend most of my browsing sifting through the guano. Yes, I find the gem or two; sometimes I find things that would have never found its way into a magazine, but the effort takes a toll on me physically.

There’s also the issue of portability. I have a laptop – two actually – but what’s the point? What about the ultimate portability of human-to-print interfacing with good old fashioned ink? Do you really take your laptop everywhere?

I could go on.

Print lingers because it still meets the basic marketing paradigm: it serves a useful purpose. I suppose there will come a day when 100 perfect bound pages of 80 pound gloss stock will be as rare as a rotary phone, but it hasn’t happened yet. And if the stats are correct – it’ll be quite a while yet before we will truly say that print is dead. - HP

Source: Magazine Publishers Association

Well Rising

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

I was rummaging through some notes and rediscovered this wonderfully written poem – quite possibly one of my favorites. It is called ‘The Well Rising’ by William Stafford; featured by NPR in its coverage of John Felstiner’s book “Can Poetry Save the Earth?”

The well rising without sound,
the spring on a hillside,
the plowshare brimming through the deep ground
everywhere in the field —

The sharp swallows in their swerve
flaring and hesitating
hunting for the final curve
coming closer and closer —

The swallow heart from wing beat to wing beat
counseling decision, decision:
thunderous examples. I place my feet
with care in such a world.

-HP

Distorted Facts on Distorted Demand

Friday, September 11th, 2009

I’m not really a political man. I don’t join parties. I don’t like ideology. I take ‘political aptitude tests’ when I’m bored. One time I tested as a “Liberal Economic Libertarian.” Another test, I surfaced as a “Moderate Republican.” It really depends on the issues.

Take health care reform. I’ve actually done some research in this area – mostly in the service of clients but also in covering healthcare issues for OC Metro and Brentwood Magazine.

A friend of mine knows that I support the present legislative effort to reform healthcare. He does not. After some email sparring over our counter opinions, he sent me a link to an article written by a technologist named David Goldhill published this summer by Atlantic Monthly entitled How American Health Care Killed My Father. Almost as dramatic as my OC Metro article “How Men Die.”

Goldhill’s article reads well, but I found it filled with errors. Moreover, many of his assumptions are based on simple anecdotes and nary any serious research.

For instance, while he decries any government involvement in health care delivery, he concedes that a ‘single-payer’ system – e.g., a public insurance system – might provide a better solution (but doesn’t state why). Then he goes on to make the very common mistake of using Medicare and Canada care as examples of how costs will increase and care will decline under single-payer. It’s a bad assumption because it assumes that upward trend for demand will be constant.

While he correctly describes the cause of the present crisis – distorted demand – he fails to identify where the distortion came from. If he had, he wouldn’t have come to the conclusion that he makes (i.e., no government involvement, let the markets decide). For that lesson, you have to roll back the calendar to the early 1970s when “managed” healthcare took over the doctor-patient relationship. Instead of a personal relationship with your doctor (ala “Marcus Welby MD”) – there was a switchboard, an appointment desk, a patient timeline and productivity quotas. Doctors who wanted to participate in the new system were DISCOURAGED from offering preventative healthcare advice because the Managers said that such interactions were off task and wasteful (Greenfield, Kaplan, et al, 2003).

That’s how the two errors are related – when Goldhill notes the benefits of good patient-doctor relationships but fails to mention that every patient care research conducted for the last twenty years has found that good doctor-patient relationships (as opposed to cost-containment measures) tend to curtail demand (Gerteis, Edgman-Levitan, et al, 1993). Moreover, improved patient-doctor communication also produces measurable improvement in clinical outcomes (Greenfield, Kaplan, et al, 1985; 1988; 1989) – thereby reducing demand again.

And as most of us know, when demand goes down, overall cost to the system goes down.

That’s why I’m engaged in the present debate – working with a handful of non-partisan physicians and researchers to ensure that any meaningful reform includes provisions that removes the distortions created by managed care in the first place. Our assertion is that not only should we encourage greater doctor-patient interaction, but reward doctors for dispensing wellness advice and resources. I also believe that American health care is due for some ‘deprofessionalization’ – especially in areas of dispensing wellness services, treatment maintenance, non-critical care (Ehrenreich, 1978; “The Social Economics of Health Care” Davis, 2001).

By the way, variations of this concept are found under “Wellness Programs” or “Patient Wellness” in one proposal now circulating in the House and in the current draft of the so-called “Baucus Reform Proposal.”

Clearly, this is not an issue for laissez-faire capitalism to solve – yet many people have been hoodwinked into believing that it is. Just remember that we’ve tried that experiment already and look where it has left us. Universal greed makes the private sector ill equipped to provide a fair and timely solution for Universal Care. That’s why we need to support the current legislative effort and engage Congress and the President – to make sure that old mistakes are not repeated. - HP